Stock Photo - A composite of the August 21, 2017 total solar eclipse assembled using the HDR program Photomatix Pro v6. . . The composite is from 11 exposures, from 1/1000 to 0. 4 seconds. All taken with the Astro-Physics 106mm apo refractor at f/5 and 500mm focal length with the Canon 6D MkII at ISO 100. . . In addition to the HDR set, I layered in a 12th exposure taken just before third contact, blended with Darken mode and with a luminosity mask to reveal just its contribution of the inner corona and prominences, to better show the prominences along the western limb that were so dramatic visually. Without this exposure layer the prominences were being washed out by the HDR blend, as good as it was. . . Photomatix 6 does a very good job merging the corona features and nicely compressed the dynamic range producing a natural result. I used the Contrast Optimizer mode and a Realistic preset to start, then varied the settings considerably to yield a final result that looked natural and best resembled the visual appearance, without undo exaggeration of contrast and excessive sharpening that, while it might reveal more coronal structure, lends an over-cooked and noisy appearance to the image. . . Thereâ. . s no point in me saying exactly where all the sliders were set, as any images you try to merge will be different, requiring a different combination of settings. . . Even so, Photomatix, while it did a much better job than Photoshopâ. . s HDR Pro and other third party HDR programs such as Aurora HDR (which did a poor job), did have its flaws. . . Notably, it produced badly aliased edge effects along the limb of the Moon despite the images being registered and aligned. This is a common flaw of HDRs along high-contrast edges. . . So, to remove or hide the worst of the HDR edge artifacts, Iâ. . ve performed a cheat here and artifically darkened the disk of the Moon and its limb with mask. Which is why I recommend using luminosity masks instead to merge images, though they are more work and do result in a lower-contrast image. They do not have any of the edge artifacts of HDRs. . . However, at typical social media resolutions you would never see the difference, nor the flaw I was hiding. . . Even so, I think the final result looks natural, as the disk of the Moon really does look darker than the surrounding sky to the eye. . . The bright star at left is Regulus. It is amazing how many people who shot the eclipse had no idea that star was there.